The International Monetary Fund has recommended implementing new fiscal policies to address the environmental and economic impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technology. The agency has proposed imposing a green tax on AI-related carbon emissions and taxing excess profits to mitigate the negative effects of AI development.

According to the IMF, the rapid advancement of Generative AI technology has led to a significant increase in energy consumption, particularly in data centers where AI systems are trained and operated. The agency believes that taxing carbon emissions associated with AI usage is a necessary step to account for the environmental costs of the technology.

While AI currently accounts for less than half of electricity use in data centers, analysts predict a 160% increase in power demand by the end of the decade, leading to a substantial rise in carbon dioxide emissions. For example, the training of AI models like ChatGPT can result in emissions equivalent to hundreds of round trips between major cities.

The IMF has emphasized the importance of not directly taxing AI itself, as this could hinder technology adoption and put countries at a disadvantage. Instead, the agency suggests increasing capital income taxes, such as corporation tax and personal income taxes, as well as implementing an excess profits tax to address the economic implications of AI automation.

The potential job losses resulting from AI automation have raised concerns about widening wealth inequality and reducing the labor income share in national income. The IMF estimates that up to 60% of jobs in the U.S. and U.K. could be negatively affected by AI technology, particularly in cognitive occupations and white-collar professions.

To address these challenges, the IMF proposes reevaluating tax policies to align with the changing landscape of work and income distribution. The agency believes that AI can also be leveraged to enhance tax enforcement and redesign taxation systems to better reflect the evolving nature of work and wealth generation.

However, the IMF acknowledges the uncertainty surrounding the future impacts of AI technology and recognizes that policy responses will need to adapt to unforeseen developments. As such, the agency’s recommendations are intended to provide a framework for responding to the potential challenges of AI adoption and ensuring that the benefits of AI are distributed equitably across society.

In conclusion, the IMF’s proposal to tax AI-related carbon emissions and excess profits reflects a broader effort to address the environmental and economic implications of AI technology. By reevaluating tax policies and leveraging AI for tax enforcement, governments can better prepare for the significant changes that AI automation may bring to the workforce and economy.

Lidhja e burimit