HomeCII/OTCan Auto Updates for Critical Infrastructure Be Trusted?

Can Auto Updates for Critical Infrastructure Be Trusted?

Published on

spot_img

The recent technology outage in July, which resulted in estimated damages of $5.4 billion, sent shockwaves through the industry. The incident occurred when CrowdStrike distributed a Rapid Response Content Channel Update that contained an exception-handling logic flaw. This event sparked important discussions about the use of automatic updates and raised questions about their impact on security. It also prompted a reflection on the cost of the relentless pursuit of innovation and the need to rebalance priorities within the C-I-A triad.

IT and security teams are constantly under pressure to stay ahead of threats, but the CrowdStrike incident served as a stark reminder that even the most secure systems can fail. This highlights the importance of reevaluating how teams test and deploy critical updates to prevent such incidents in the future.

The C-I-A triad, which represents the Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability of technology platforms, is a cornerstone of cybersecurity. However, the industry has historically prioritized security over integrity and availability, leading to a focus on speed at the expense of thorough testing and checks.

The shift from software to critical infrastructure has necessitated a reevaluation of how updates are deployed and tested. Three key shifts are essential to achieve the necessary balance within the C-I-A triad. Firstly, vendors must be more transparent with their product updates and allow customers more control over how updates are applied. This includes the ability to manually update, deploy updates in stages, and remain on a stable version as needed.

Secondly, there needs to be a reevaluation of vendor testing processes, with a focus on ensuring integrity and availability alongside security. Automatic updates should be approached with caution, and teams should have the flexibility to choose when to update based on their specific needs.

Lastly, companies must improve their testing environments to ensure that cybersecurity teams have adequate resources for certifying and testing security updates. This level of diligence is crucial as security becomes an integral component of critical infrastructure across various industries.

In conclusion, the cybersecurity landscape is continually evolving, requiring a reevaluation of priorities and a commitment to maintaining a balance between security, integrity, and availability. By embracing proven patterns of change management and empowering customers with greater control over updates, the industry can build more resilient systems and regain trust. This shift will ensure that teams can effectively respond to threats while avoiding complacency and prioritizing speed over all else.

Source link

Latest articles

Anubis Ransomware Now Hitting Android and Windows Devices

 A sophisticated new ransomware threat has emerged from the cybercriminal underground, presenting a...

Real Enough to Fool You: The Evolution of Deepfakes

Not long ago, deepfakes were digital curiosities – convincing to some, glitchy to...

What Happened and Why It Matters

In June 2025, Albania once again found itself under a digital siege—this time,...

Why IT Leaders Must Rethink Backup in the Age of Ransomware

 With IT outages and disruptions escalating, IT teams are shifting their focus beyond...

More like this

Anubis Ransomware Now Hitting Android and Windows Devices

 A sophisticated new ransomware threat has emerged from the cybercriminal underground, presenting a...

Real Enough to Fool You: The Evolution of Deepfakes

Not long ago, deepfakes were digital curiosities – convincing to some, glitchy to...

What Happened and Why It Matters

In June 2025, Albania once again found itself under a digital siege—this time,...