As organizations around the world grapple with the relentless and ever-evolving nature of cybersecurity threats, the necessity for tools to expedite security operations, automate processes and responses, known as SOAR, has significantly increased.
The latest “Internet Crime Report” from the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center revealed that global losses from cybercrime have surged to $10.3 billion in 2022, marking a 281% increase since 2018. Coupled with the staggering financial impact of cybercrime, information security (infosec) teams are facing the monumental challenge of keeping pace with these threats due to limited resources, personnel, and the proliferation of diverse security tools that demand constant monitoring, analysis, and triage.
SOAR tools address these real-world enterprise cybersecurity challenges and offer support in several key areas, including security orchestration, process automation, and response through a unified threat intelligence platform, enabling security professionals to collaborate and share information seamlessly across teams.
The adoption of SOAR tools in security programs is driven by three major business incentives. Firstly, SOAR provides centralized visibility and insight into automatically detected threats. Secondly, it prioritizes and analyzes threats based on their risk level to the organization. Thirdly, SOAR systems efficiently manage low-level incidents, thereby enabling support for human analysts while assisting in scaling their capabilities.
In order to realize the benefits of SOAR while avoiding potential pitfalls, organizations must look beyond the technology itself. It is essential to address the broader security culture and avoid deploying SOAR tools simply as a quick fix for deeper, underlying security strategy and operational issues.
Security experts note that successful SOAR implementation results in improved productivity, minimized manual work, enhanced allocation of human resources, and better utilization of existing security tools, among other benefits. However, they also caution about potential challenges, such as an inability to integrate with broader security strategy, issues related to security culture, and an overreliance on software rather than human analysts.
To ensure successful SOAR adoption, organizations must align the objectives of the tool with the broader cybersecurity roadmap, identify relevant metrics for measuring success, and understand that SOAR serves to empower human analysts rather than replace them entirely. While it is essential for security organizations to evolve in the face of escalating cyber threats, SOAR technologies offer an opportunity to enhance security postures and leverage the combined strengths of human expertise and automation.
In conclusion, as the cybersecurity landscape continues to evolve, the integration of SOAR tools is becoming increasingly critical for organizations to streamline security operations and effectively combat the growing threats in the digital environment. By marrying the capabilities of human professionals with automated technologies, SOAR offers a compelling solution to address the multifaceted challenges posed by cybercrime.