KrebsOnSecurity recently published a detailed investigation on the consumer data broker Radaris, shedding light on the original owners who are two men residing in Massachusetts. These individuals were found to have been involved in the operation of various Russian-language dating services and affiliate programs, along with a wide range of people-search websites. The exposé has caused quite a stir, with the subjects threatening legal action for defamation unless the story is retracted.
According to the attorney representing the individuals identified as the co-founders of Radaris, the story painted his clients in a negative light by associating them with Radaris and implying connections to dubious elements in Russia. The attorney vehemently denied any involvement of his clients in the operations or ownership of Radaris.
Further digging into the background of Radaris revealed a less-than-stellar reputation for responsiveness to consumer requests to remove their information from the platform. This, combined with the efforts made to hide the true ownership of the company, sparked KrebsOnSecurity’s interest in unraveling the origins of Radaris.
The attorney representing the individuals named in the story demanded a retraction and an apology, claiming that his clients were not associated with Radaris in any capacity. The attorney also pointed out that the identified CEO of Radaris was a fabricated identity created by the company’s marketing department.
Despite the threats of legal action, KrebsOnSecurity sought clarification on the inaccuracies alleged by the attorney and extended an invitation to provide evidence for any factual errors in the reporting. Questions regarding the identity of the current Radaris CEO and the true founder of the company remain unanswered.
The attorney later revised the demand, stating that his clients would be satisfied if their names were removed from the story. Additionally, revelations were made about the fake CEO, Gary Norden, who was created by Radaris’ marketing department and mentioned in press releases and media stories seeking investments.
The attorney also shared resumes of the individuals in question, revealing connections to various companies and domains linked to Radaris and its operations. The details uncovered shed light on a web of interconnected entities and individuals, raising questions about the true ownership and management of Radaris.
In light of these findings, questions linger about the authenticity of Radaris’ operations and the veracity of its leadership claims. The tangled web of relationships and the elusive nature of the true owners behind Radaris cast a shadow of doubt over the company’s operations and practices. As the saga continues to unfold, the truth behind Radaris and its murky origins remains a subject of scrutiny and intrigue.