Legal Proceedings Unfold in Scio Township Case Involving Supervisor Kerry
SCIO TOWNSHIP, MI — In a courtroom setting that has drawn significant attention, a political opponent of Scio Township Supervisor Jillian Kerry recently testified about a perplexing incident involving an email that appeared to have been forwarded from his account without his prior knowledge. The testimony occurred during a court hearing focused on a felony computer crimes case against Kerry, centering on an email that allegedly was sent from the email account of former township Supervisor Will Hathaway on November 15, 2023.
The prosecution claims that Kerry intentionally forwarded the email, which contained a conversation between Hathaway and a township attorney regarding election workers, to the township clerk, Jessica Flintoft. This allegation has escalated the legal battle between Kerry and her political adversaries, raising questions about the integrity of communication within the township’s governance.
Kerry’s defense attorney, R. Michael Bullotta, passionately argued that his client did not have malicious intent and contended that the email in question may have been trapped in a draft format and inadvertently sent automatically. This defense pivots on the ambiguity surrounding how the email ended up in Flintoft’s inbox, seeking to cast doubt on the prosecution’s claim of intentional wrongdoing.
Hathaway, who has a long-standing rivalry with Kerry but did not run against her in the last election, expressed his bewilderment when the email was forwarded without his consent. In court, he stated, “I was surprised and trying to make sense out of it.” He emphasized that he had not planned to forward the email and had not even used his computer at the time it was sent. His confusion over the incident deepens the mystery as he described the situation as “puzzling,” further fueling speculation regarding the events that led to the email being sent.
Unquestionably, the rivalry between Hathaway and Kerry plays a significant role in this case. Despite not directly opposing Kerry in the last election cycle, Hathaway positioned himself as a principal financial backer for the “Fix Scio” political action committee. This committee aimed specifically to oppose Kerry and other candidates aligned with her vision for the township. Such political dynamics contribute to the perception that this case may be more than just a simple miscommunication; it could be a manifestation of deeper divides within township governance.
As the preliminary examination progressed, another witness, Ian Hubert, vice chair of the township’s roads advisory board, provided additional context during his testimony. Hubert mentioned that he observed Kerry attempting to initiate a Zoom meeting for the advisory board at the precise moment the email was forwarded, suggesting that her focus might have been elsewhere rather than on illicitly forwarding correspondence. Hubert underscored that he did not believe Kerry was attempting any illegal action during the incident, reinforcing her claim of innocence.
The alleged action has serious legal implications for Kerry. She faces charges of utilizing a computer to commit a crime, potentially leading to a maximum penalty of four years in prison and a $5,000 fine. Additionally, she is charged with interfering with electronic communications, which could result in a maximum of two years in prison and a $1,000 fine. Both counts represent significant felonies, placing Kerry at the center of a potentially life-altering legal struggle that could impact her political career and personal life.
Judge J. Cedric Simpson of the 14A District Court presided over the hearing and decided to adjourn the session, with plans to resume at 11 a.m. on Tuesday, May 13. The adjournment also set the stage for the next witness, a detective involved in the ongoing investigation, who is expected to provide further insights into the circumstances surrounding the email and the overall case against Kerry.
As the intricacies of this case continue to unfold, it has captured the attention of the Ann Arbor region, raising questions about transparency and accountability in local governance. Observers await the next steps in both the legal process and the ongoing political ramifications in Scio Township.
For those interested in staying informed about this legal proceeding and other developments in the area, they can bookmark the local Ann Arbor news page or sign up for the free “3@3 Ann Arbor” daily newsletter, ensuring they are kept up to date on this and other significant stories as they evolve.