HomeRisk ManagementsSecurity leaders discuss their experiences with zero trust implementations

Security leaders discuss their experiences with zero trust implementations

Published on

spot_img

In the quest to improve security measures, government agencies are also employing the concept of zero trust. Recently, the unnamed agency had been grappling with issues related to identity management and access control. The lack of governance led to what experts call “access creep,” where individuals retained unnecessary access even after leaving the organization.

To address these concerns, Mary Carmichael, the agency’s security lead, embarked on a journey to introduce the zero trust model. Her first step involved defining zero trust and highlighting the importance of investing in this approach to all stakeholders. By creating a shared understanding of zero trust, Carmichael was able to pave the way for implementing the necessary technological solutions like network segmentation, Privileged Access Management (PAM), and Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). Additionally, process changes were identified as crucial to support the transition towards zero trust.

Nick Puetz, a managing director at consultancy firm Protiviti specializing in cyber strategy, commended Carmichael’s efforts, noting that many organizations face similar challenges when adopting zero trust. Often, different components of zero trust are already in place within an organization, but they operate independently. A zero-trust framework can help bring these components together to enhance overall security.

The concept of zero trust revolves around the idea of never trusting, always verifying. In a zero trust environment, every user and device must prove their identity and meet specific security criteria before gaining access to any resources. This approach is in stark contrast to traditional security models, which typically grant broad access based on network location or user credentials.

Implementing a zero trust model requires a shift in mindset, as organizations must move away from the assumption that internal networks are safe. Instead, zero trust advocates for continuous verification and monitoring to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches. By adopting this approach, organizations can significantly enhance their security posture and better protect sensitive information.

Furthermore, the implementation of zero trust can lead to improved regulatory compliance, as organizations can demonstrate a proactive approach to managing cybersecurity risks. With data breaches on the rise and cyber threats becoming more sophisticated, a zero trust model offers a proactive and adaptive solution to safeguarding critical assets.

Overall, the journey towards zero trust is a strategic and transformative process that requires collaboration across different teams and departments. By aligning on a shared definition of zero trust and investing in the necessary technology and process changes, organizations can enhance their security posture and mitigate the risks associated with today’s evolving threat landscape.

Source link

Latest articles

What Happened and Why It Matters

In June 2025, Albania once again found itself under a digital siege—this time,...

Why IT Leaders Must Rethink Backup in the Age of Ransomware

 With IT outages and disruptions escalating, IT teams are shifting their focus beyond...

The Battle Behind the Screens

 As the world watches the escalating military conflict between Israel and Iran, another...

Can we ever fully secure autonomous industrial systems?

 In the rapidly evolving world of industrial IoT (IIoT), the integration of AI-driven...

More like this

What Happened and Why It Matters

In June 2025, Albania once again found itself under a digital siege—this time,...

Why IT Leaders Must Rethink Backup in the Age of Ransomware

 With IT outages and disruptions escalating, IT teams are shifting their focus beyond...

The Battle Behind the Screens

 As the world watches the escalating military conflict between Israel and Iran, another...